Free tool
What did your competitors change this week?
Name up to three of their pages. Once a week you get an email listing what changed on each one, in plain text: the lines that appeared, the lines that disappeared, the title if it moved. No dashboard, no analysis, no login. It is the one input to your weekly review that you cannot get from your own numbers.
Start a watch
Coming soon
This one is built and is not switched on yet. It goes live shortly, and when it does it will be free and ungated like the rest of them, with no sign-up and nothing stored.
In the meantime the written version of the habit this feeds is the weekly review: thirty minutes, six questions, one of them about competitors.
How it works
You name up to three pages
A pricing page, a services page, a home page. Public pages only, and only ones you could open in a browser yourself.
You confirm the address
One email with a link. Until it is opened nothing is watched and nothing else is sent; an unconfirmed request is deleted after 48 hours.
The first snapshot is taken
Within the hour. The visible text of each page, split into lines, is stored so there is something to compare against.
Once a week, the diff
The lines that appeared and the lines that disappeared on each page since last week, and the title if it changed. Unchanged is reported as unchanged.
What it is not
It does not analyse
No summary, no opinion, no model. You read the changed lines and decide what they mean, which takes about a minute in the weekly review.
It does not crawl
It reads the exact pages you gave it, once a week, and follows no links. It reads robots.txt first and skips a page that asks not to be read.
It does not see everything
Visible text only. A new photo, a design change, a script, a price rendered by JavaScript after load: none of that shows up, and the digest says so.
It does not keep history
One snapshot per page, overwritten each week. There is no archive to browse and no data to sell, because there is no data.
Why a diff and not a report
Most competitor tracking fails the same way: it produces a report, the report is long, and nobody reads it. A diff is short by construction. If nothing changed, the email is two lines. If a competitor rewrote their pricing page, the email is the new lines and the old lines, and you can tell in a minute whether it matters. That is exactly the size of thing that fits into a thirty-minute weekly review, which is where this is meant to be read.
It also means there is nothing to get wrong. There is no model in the path, so nothing is summarised, inferred or invented. What you receive is what the page now says that it did not say last week, and only that.
What we do with the data, stated plainly
This is the only tool on the site that stores anything, so here is the whole list: your address, the pages, the schedule, and one text snapshot per page. An unconfirmed sign-up lives 48 hours. A confirmed watch lives six months and then stops unless you renew it. Unsubscribing deletes all of it at once. It is used for nothing else, it is not joined to anything else, and the digest never carries an offer. The retention rules are written into the code that runs the tool, not into a policy page that the code could drift away from.
On the other side, this reads other people's public pages, so it
behaves like a good visitor: it says who it is, it reads
robots.txt first, it never follows a link, and a site that
asks not to be read is not read. Details on that, including how to
block it, are in the FAQ below.
What to do with what it tells you
Usually nothing, and that is fine: the value is knowing rather than reacting. Occasionally it is the prompt for a decision: a competitor started listing hours you do not, added a service you already offer but never mention, or changed how they describe the thing you both sell. If the change is about how fast they answer, run the speed-to-lead calculator on your own numbers first. If it is about what their site says in the first four seconds, run the website test on your own page before you worry about theirs. If you run several locations, the digest is worth watching from head office rather than nine branches each guessing, which is the argument on the multi location page.